Full bibliography
Artificial Suffering: An Argument for a Global Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
Resource type
Journal Article
Author/contributor
- Metzinger, Thomas (Author)
Title
Artificial Suffering: An Argument for a Global Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
Abstract
This paper has a critical and a constructive part. The first part formulates a political demand, based on ethical considerations: Until 2050, there should be a global moratorium on synthetic phenomenology, strictly banning all research that directly aims at or knowingly risks the emergence of artificial consciousness on post-biotic carrier systems. The second part lays the first conceptual foundations for an open-ended process with the aim of gradually refining the original moratorium, tying it to an ever more fine-grained, rational, evidence-based, and hopefully ethically convincing set of constraints. The systematic research program defined by this process could lead to an incremental reformulation of the original moratorium. It might result in a moratorium repeal even before 2050, in the continuation of a strict ban beyond the year 2050, or a gradually evolving, more substantial, and ethically refined view of which — if any — kinds of conscious experience we want to implement in AI systems.
Publication
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
Volume
08
Issue
01
Pages
43-66
Date
03/2021
Journal Abbr
J. AI. Consci.
Language
en
ISSN
2705-0785, 2705-0793
Short Title
Artificial Suffering
Accessed
3/7/25, 7:17 AM
Library Catalog
DOI.org (Crossref)
Citation
Metzinger, T. (2021). Artificial Suffering: An Argument for a Global Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness, 08(01), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1142/S270507852150003X
Link to this record