Full bibliography

Return to list of results

There and back again: Biological naturalism provides no new scientific progress on the matter of AI consciousness

RIS

Recommended format for most reference management software

BibTeX

Recommended format for BibTeX-specific software

Resource type
Journal Article
Author/contributor
Title
There and back again: Biological naturalism provides no new scientific progress on the matter of AI consciousness
Abstract
Seth presents several arguments for why multiple realization is not necessarily true. However, this is not a common opinion in consciousness research. He fails to provide arguments why we should believe in biological naturalism over multiple realization, which is the actual challenge to create progress.
Publication
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Date
2026/01
Volume
49
Pages
e351
DOI
10.1017/S0140525X25103543
URL
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/abs/there-and-back-again-biological-naturalism-provides-no-new-scientific-progress-on-the-matter-of-ai-consciousness/A9020954582031364DEDA1B42FD74B55
Accessed
9/28/26, 7:04 AM
ISSN
0140-525X, 1469-1825
Short Title
There and back again
Language
en
Library Catalog
Cambridge University Press
Citation
Overgaard, M. S. (2026). There and back again: Biological naturalism provides no new scientific progress on the matter of AI consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 49, e351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25103543
Link to this record
http://127.0.0.1:5000/bibliography/J66KEDLL